SnoXer18
Extreme
This post is inspired by me just finishing shoveling my MTX out of the yard. Front skis riding nicely on the snow, track dug 3' down to hardpack. Something has to change.
I've had my MTX a few years and never been completely satisfied with deep snow performance. I feel that the MTX is better in deep snow than my REV 440 121" x 1.75" but not by much. The MTX front stays on top of the snow good by the rear is a trenching machine and trying to take off in deep snow often results in massive piles of snow being evacuated out the back and not much forward motion.
That being said. The stock track feels soft, is it just folding over when trying to take off? Is the Maverick junk? I have had a brand new camoplast challenger 151" x 14" x 2.3" sitting in the garage that I purchases about the same time as the sled with plans to replace the track once the stock failed.
#1 is the challenger going to be that much better than the maverick?
#2 which method of making it fit will offer the best all around performance? I still ride trail but mainly use the MTX to boondock through the woods and fields.
I believe that the set-back would offer better performance strictly based on deep snow use, but I question it retaining trail manners. ie. heavy steering and the fact the skid is 3.5" back I'd be putting that much more stress on the center shock. Conversely, I think the extensions would maintain similar trail manners and handling characteristics, but I question weather I'd be giving up a lot of deep snow performance or not.
Basically, is it going to make much difference whether I set-back or extend or is the real game changers going to be the track?
I've had my MTX a few years and never been completely satisfied with deep snow performance. I feel that the MTX is better in deep snow than my REV 440 121" x 1.75" but not by much. The MTX front stays on top of the snow good by the rear is a trenching machine and trying to take off in deep snow often results in massive piles of snow being evacuated out the back and not much forward motion.
That being said. The stock track feels soft, is it just folding over when trying to take off? Is the Maverick junk? I have had a brand new camoplast challenger 151" x 14" x 2.3" sitting in the garage that I purchases about the same time as the sled with plans to replace the track once the stock failed.
#1 is the challenger going to be that much better than the maverick?
#2 which method of making it fit will offer the best all around performance? I still ride trail but mainly use the MTX to boondock through the woods and fields.
I believe that the set-back would offer better performance strictly based on deep snow use, but I question it retaining trail manners. ie. heavy steering and the fact the skid is 3.5" back I'd be putting that much more stress on the center shock. Conversely, I think the extensions would maintain similar trail manners and handling characteristics, but I question weather I'd be giving up a lot of deep snow performance or not.
Basically, is it going to make much difference whether I set-back or extend or is the real game changers going to be the track?