Hi
A response to your response (with quotes...this thread is getting long. ;-)
"I don't like that I'll have to fiddle with the sled to get it running the way I want, mostly because I'm not technically inclined, especially on an RX."
It will RUN perfectly the day you buy it. Only the suspension setup takes a little trial and error, and thats very easy with this forum. I don't deal with suspensions well, but by ready a few posts on this forum and making a couple tweaks during a one day trail ride, I'm very happy with what I have. The engine is typical 4 stroke...turn the key and go. It will perform very well bone stock. Some will fiddle with jetting, clutching, etc. to gain a hair more, but I can say, bone stock you WILL be very happy with the power.
"Gas mileage, well thanks for being honest. I was told 25 MPG by the dealer here. Not even close. The RX-1 seems to get what my SDI does. Less the fact I don't have to burn oil in the RX, which is a plus."
25 is about what the non turbo cats get (I have no idea about the turbos). They also have half the power we do. As for operating cost, I figured the cost of running my RX vs. my old ZRT, and just counting gas, oil, and plugs, I saved $600 last season. Thats running 87 octane vs. 93 (my RX runs perfectly on 87...its all I've ever run in it), no oil injection, and no plugs needing to be changed on a regular basis.
"The way the engine will last is a huge plus for me. I can't put that one into words."
Have you read an RX owner's manual yet? Change the engine and chain case oil every 2000 miles. Change the oil filter at 12,000 miles. Adjust the valve clearance every 25,000 miles. Plan to own it long enough to adjust the valves???
"By the way, I went into the cat dealer, slick bastards, they are trying to sell me the 2005 Turbo 660cc, that red and white thing. It is too expensive, not to mention no deals on it, and it's a short track...I love suzuki and I bet the engine is amazing, but I can't stand the way that thing looks, and I've always hated Cats. hehehehe"
Yea, its funny the Cats cost as much as the RX, have FAR less power (even the turbos are said to be about like an average 600 2-smoker), while the RX is on par with 800s. And yea, I hate the looks. I hate to say it, but I actually think I like last year's non turbos better than the looks of the new turbos.
Jim