I read (Camoplast catalog) The Maverick is rated for Deep Powder/ Hard Pack, Camo Extreme Deep Powder/ Firm Pack, but it seems most guys opinions are that the Camo is the firmer of the two, what's the deal?
camo is firmer,im changing the track and selling my mav track,im not always in bottomless fluff..i have the camo on the shelf and its a nice looking very very firm track(durable)
I was going to swap the camo in after reading so many reports of the Maverick ripping and tearing paddles off. After actually recieving my sled and looking at the track the maverick is clearly beefed up from last years. The paddles are slightly different also. I'm just going to ride it and see how it does before swapping tracks. I don't think they'll be any durability issues this year.
Nikolai, that's what I saw as well when I looked at my Nytro, it looks and feels very firm and not knowing where the problems with the Mavericks were, that's my concern. So is this a "New & Upgraded" Maverick track for 2008?
If you aren't going to be running boost, then you should get the camo so we can do a side by side comparison of which is better. My MTX is staying 100% stock except the addition of a skidplate.
i dont have my mtx yet,but from the spring photos on snowest showing the paddles laying forward i decided to get the camo..im anxious to see the stock track and compare side by side quality
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.