RTX Rox
Pro
I've been reading my butt off on here about all the info on the Yamachargers but I haven't seen much about peoples sucsess. I have just recently bought one and am in the middle of putting it on.
Does anyone want to tell any acutal numbers MPH that they've seen with a yamacharger or even better a yamacharger with ignition and fuel programed???
Does anyone want to tell any acutal numbers MPH that they've seen with a yamacharger or even better a yamacharger with ignition and fuel programed???
87gtNOS
VIP Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2005
- Messages
- 1,892
- Age
- 50
- Location
- Toronto
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- 12 Apex XTX MCX powered
RTX Rox said:
Look around man....how much snow is there?!?!?!?!?!?!
I am posting my results on HCS.
1.8lbs of boost just shy of 11000rpm with last years nitrous clutching that revved 10200 on the motor. This was done last Sunday in a 4 mile run down Wasaga Beach! LOL!
kviper
VIP Member
87gtNOS, I am reading 1.8-1.9 lb boost with the same gauge that you have. The gauge seems to be very accurate and consistent.
87gtNOS said:
Why not post your results here, on an all Yamaha site?
drdoug
Newbie
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 9
- Age
- 58
- Location
- Sudbury Ontario
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- 2024 Sidewinder SRX LE EPS
i have a yamacharger with excell full ex pc3 fuel and ign lcd and super tips ran 133.6(151 on the dreamo meter) in long run last year yesterday trail track reverse in running on the lake about 3ooo feet running high 130s dreamo meter translates to low 120 s radar
mr.pitstop
Expert
I just took mine for a couple small rides with no place to open it up yet and I could feel a definate increase in pull in midrange.. We'll see how it is when I can open it up..
SledFreak
TY 4 Stroke God
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2005
- Messages
- 5,514
- Location
- Ontario. Canada
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- Current 2020 ThunderCat. - SOLD!
drdoug said:
yep, my old sled......
MUSKIE
TY 4 Stroke Junkie
RTX Rox said:
- the system works as stated Rox. - finish up and give it a ride...and yes- ign. and fuel setup right will help also.........have fun !!
RTX Rox
Pro
87gtNOS said:
Bro, I'm as pumped as the next guy about a bit of snow on the ground but I'm the last guy you'll ever see being the first guy to hit the trail with 2" of shitty snow on it. I'm excited too but it's still early.
Still fella's, no real results. There was lots of "felt real good" and "would have been on Radar" but no real numbers.
Is it unrealistic to think if you had it set up with proper clutching that with the Yamacharger you could see 120+ MPH
grader
TY 4 Stroke Master
it bloody well better. my stretched 05 rx (136) did 116 on radar and my buds shorty did 119. but then ive been told mine is exceptional so that helps. stock apexes run 120-123 so adding 20 hp better do something except lighten your wallet.
SledFreak
TY 4 Stroke God
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2005
- Messages
- 5,514
- Location
- Ontario. Canada
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- Current 2020 ThunderCat. - SOLD!
RTX Rox said:
obviously you did not read drdoug posts?
Here are the results we saw from our testing, we are currently testing the 2011 apex and will release the results when testing is finalized. Jeff
1st post
Simons CPR has begun testing our g force yam charger apex and we are very impressed with what we have seen so far, over the next couple of weeks we will be posting our results. so far we have seen a 20 hp increase at the crankshaft, so where a stock apex is usually around 147-148 horsepower, we are seeing 167-168 hp consistantly on a long hard steady state pull, the powerband is very linear and will be very easy to clutch, i am currently updating my dyno software, and next week we will be continuing our testing with a power commander and exhaust modifications that should further enhance the G Force yamcharger system, after that we will be doing some track dyno evaluation, based on the power we are seeing on the engine dyno, and the power to the track that we all ready see with our simons supertune clutch kit on a stock apex, we should see around a 20 hp increase to the track over a bone stock apex. your talking a 95 track horsepower apex in trail form on pump gas with a very broad power band that cams and head porting will not be able to compete with. simons cpr very is excited to be distributing these kits for g-force because they fill a nitch between the stock apexs and boosted apexs that have previously been an all or nothing solution, when you look at the cost of a supercharger or turbo kit, and compare it to a big bore or cammed and ported apex, there really isn't a huge difference in price, however the turbos and superchargers will make way more power. granted there are problems associated with both, but for those looking for max power the pressurized solutions have been outstanding. now with the g force, yamcharger, you get a direct drive bolt on kit that appears to me will have little to no problems, and produce around 2 pounds of boost, while working well with the stock fuel system, the cost for this system is 2200.00 and is easy to install. we have already seen 20 hp gain, and i feel with a exhaust mod and some timing we will see possibly as much as 25 hp. all of our testing should be finished by the end of next week and we are currently taking orders for the yamchargers now. if anyone has any questions on this kit feel free to call me directly
p.s. I would also like to thank Kevin Boelk for donating his sled for this testing and for all the hard work he has put into helping us test this product. thanks Kevin.
Jeff Simon / Simons CPR
1-414-698-6611
2nd post
i think 87 octane will be fine for most cases, also, i did some math....lets look at what you get horsepower per dollar
1500 us for 8 hp on airbox mod, exhaust can, clutching and controllers, simple install you can do yourself. = 187.5 per horsepower
2200 us for 20 hp on yamcharger with clutching
simple install you can do yourself. = 110.00 per horsepower
6350 us for 90 hp on turbo + fuel controller+ clutching
difficult install, mechanically inclined people can do themselves
without install = 70.55 per horsepower
with install (1200) =83.88 per horsepower
all kits work well, just depends on your budget, i personally think the yamcharger is a good value, that 5 axis cnc billet alum impeller is not cheap to produce, and when is the last time you priced dies to make those plastic pieces as well as the other related parts that make up the kit, and thats not even added in the developmental costs, i.m sure there were multiple prototypes thrown away to get it to this point, any big bore kit or piped venture is usually around 100 per horsepower, so i'd say they also hit the mark value wise. jeff
3rd post
snowy1 wrote:
if it works as advertised that 20 hp. is only true at sea level, as there is no adjustability as in boost or pulley size you can not adjust for elevation. so as you go up in elevation your hp gains get smaller. and for the mountain guys at 10,000 ft. you will lose 30% so thats 14 hp. gain for $2200 I don,t think thats a good deal, atleast with a turbo or supercharger you can adjust for elevation and maintain the same gains.
well my stock apex at sea level makes 148 hp, according to your calculations, your stock apex at 10,000 ft elevation makes 103 hp
if you do the math, they both receive a 13.5 percent increase in horsepower over the stock engine horsepower regardless of what elevation your at....so the value increase is the same.
and for that matter the same could be said for any sled modifications at high altitude other than a turbo and supercharger,
is a turbo or supercharger a better horsepower per dollar investment with benefits increasing with higher altitudes?....yes, no question about it. the turbo is actually the best because it is more efficient and will self compensate boost pressure with altitude changes, whereas the supercharger needs to have the pulley ratios changed per elevation change to get back the boost.
the yamcharger is not designed to compete with turbos and superchargers. this is for a guy who wants a little extra horsepower at a much lower cost without the hassles. jeff
4th post
all the results will be posted soon, just finished working on the track dyno for the evening, kevin and I started at 10.00am this morning and it is 10.00pm now. time for sleep and well be back at it in the morning. we are very close on the clutching, we are working with stk modified weights, g force weights and heavy hitters, all are working great. as for the engine dyno...this morning before we started track dyno testing, we were finalizing the kit on the engine dyno, we confirmed that the yamcharger is all ready at a positive boost pressure at 2800 rpms, by 5000 rpms it has .5 pounds of boost, and continues to climb to a max boost pressure of 2 pounds, throttle response is better than stock due to the building of boost at such low rpms. the power is smooth and linear with a horsepower peak of 168 at 10,800 rpms, and a torque peak of 90 ft lbs around 9500 rpms.
in the next day we will be dynoing a stock apex, and then installing the pc3, ignition, and airbox mod on the same sled to be dynod again. we dynoed a customers sled with the air box mod, pc3, and ign module all ready on it, but it only made 152 hp (4 hp gain over stock) which i thought was a little low, so in the interest of giving the kit the fairest evaluation possible, we decided to re run the test to see a before and after result on the same sled in case the customers sled we dynod was not working up to its full potential. jeff
testing is finished,
we took the two baseline sleds to a radar run and also did some side by side drag racing.
just to recap....these two sleds ran side by side as stock sleds, then one of them was modified with a power commander 3, air box mod, timing advance, and an exhaust mod, it would now beat the other sled by 2.5-3.0 sled lengths in a 700 ft drag race in snow. the same kit was then installed in the other test sled and they now ran side by side again.
we returned one of the sleds to completely stock and then we installed the yamcharger and began testing.
we made 168 hp on the engine dyno, and 94 horsepower to the track on our track dyno.
thats a 20 horsepower gain at the engine, and a 16 horse power gain to the track.
now we took both sleds to the radar run at the sheboygan marsh for a unbiased radar gun test
the pc3 modified sled ran 84 mph in 660 ft
the yamcharger sled ran 89.5 mph in 660 ft
very impressive gains over a sled that was all ready modified.
next we ran them from a dead stop drag race, the yamcharger easily put seven sled lengths on the other sled in a 700 ft drag race in snow
then we went from a side by side roll on and the yamcharger would effortlessly pull away from the other sled
these yamchargers are for real, they work excellent.
they are in stock and ready to ship,
the cost is 2200.00 canadian.
we will also reprogram and support your power commanders for free if you purchase your yamcharger from Simons CPR
final pc3 results on 2006-2010 yamacharged apexs...we ended up making a much broader power band by adding the pc3 and the ignition module. the true horsepower peak moved up to 11,000 rpms and gave us around three extra horsepower. we ran it out to 11,500 rpms and only lost 2 horsepower running it that far past the power peak. the addition of the pc3 and ignition module will give you the ability to overrev the engine acouple of hundred rpms with little to no power loss for conditions that would normally tickle the start of the rev limiter...(10,800 rpms)... and drastically killl the power. (stock rev limiter starts to retard timing at 10,800 rpms and kills it at 11,200.......where our program allows full spark until 11,500 rpms) all in all the power commander adds improved throttle response, more peak horsepower, and a much broader power curve.
we are currently testing our 2011 apex, and will release those results when testing is finalized. please feel free to call us with any questions... 1-414-698-6611 Jeff Simon / Simons CPR
1st post
Simons CPR has begun testing our g force yam charger apex and we are very impressed with what we have seen so far, over the next couple of weeks we will be posting our results. so far we have seen a 20 hp increase at the crankshaft, so where a stock apex is usually around 147-148 horsepower, we are seeing 167-168 hp consistantly on a long hard steady state pull, the powerband is very linear and will be very easy to clutch, i am currently updating my dyno software, and next week we will be continuing our testing with a power commander and exhaust modifications that should further enhance the G Force yamcharger system, after that we will be doing some track dyno evaluation, based on the power we are seeing on the engine dyno, and the power to the track that we all ready see with our simons supertune clutch kit on a stock apex, we should see around a 20 hp increase to the track over a bone stock apex. your talking a 95 track horsepower apex in trail form on pump gas with a very broad power band that cams and head porting will not be able to compete with. simons cpr very is excited to be distributing these kits for g-force because they fill a nitch between the stock apexs and boosted apexs that have previously been an all or nothing solution, when you look at the cost of a supercharger or turbo kit, and compare it to a big bore or cammed and ported apex, there really isn't a huge difference in price, however the turbos and superchargers will make way more power. granted there are problems associated with both, but for those looking for max power the pressurized solutions have been outstanding. now with the g force, yamcharger, you get a direct drive bolt on kit that appears to me will have little to no problems, and produce around 2 pounds of boost, while working well with the stock fuel system, the cost for this system is 2200.00 and is easy to install. we have already seen 20 hp gain, and i feel with a exhaust mod and some timing we will see possibly as much as 25 hp. all of our testing should be finished by the end of next week and we are currently taking orders for the yamchargers now. if anyone has any questions on this kit feel free to call me directly
p.s. I would also like to thank Kevin Boelk for donating his sled for this testing and for all the hard work he has put into helping us test this product. thanks Kevin.
Jeff Simon / Simons CPR
1-414-698-6611
2nd post
i think 87 octane will be fine for most cases, also, i did some math....lets look at what you get horsepower per dollar
1500 us for 8 hp on airbox mod, exhaust can, clutching and controllers, simple install you can do yourself. = 187.5 per horsepower
2200 us for 20 hp on yamcharger with clutching
simple install you can do yourself. = 110.00 per horsepower
6350 us for 90 hp on turbo + fuel controller+ clutching
difficult install, mechanically inclined people can do themselves
without install = 70.55 per horsepower
with install (1200) =83.88 per horsepower
all kits work well, just depends on your budget, i personally think the yamcharger is a good value, that 5 axis cnc billet alum impeller is not cheap to produce, and when is the last time you priced dies to make those plastic pieces as well as the other related parts that make up the kit, and thats not even added in the developmental costs, i.m sure there were multiple prototypes thrown away to get it to this point, any big bore kit or piped venture is usually around 100 per horsepower, so i'd say they also hit the mark value wise. jeff
3rd post
snowy1 wrote:
if it works as advertised that 20 hp. is only true at sea level, as there is no adjustability as in boost or pulley size you can not adjust for elevation. so as you go up in elevation your hp gains get smaller. and for the mountain guys at 10,000 ft. you will lose 30% so thats 14 hp. gain for $2200 I don,t think thats a good deal, atleast with a turbo or supercharger you can adjust for elevation and maintain the same gains.
well my stock apex at sea level makes 148 hp, according to your calculations, your stock apex at 10,000 ft elevation makes 103 hp
if you do the math, they both receive a 13.5 percent increase in horsepower over the stock engine horsepower regardless of what elevation your at....so the value increase is the same.
and for that matter the same could be said for any sled modifications at high altitude other than a turbo and supercharger,
is a turbo or supercharger a better horsepower per dollar investment with benefits increasing with higher altitudes?....yes, no question about it. the turbo is actually the best because it is more efficient and will self compensate boost pressure with altitude changes, whereas the supercharger needs to have the pulley ratios changed per elevation change to get back the boost.
the yamcharger is not designed to compete with turbos and superchargers. this is for a guy who wants a little extra horsepower at a much lower cost without the hassles. jeff
4th post
all the results will be posted soon, just finished working on the track dyno for the evening, kevin and I started at 10.00am this morning and it is 10.00pm now. time for sleep and well be back at it in the morning. we are very close on the clutching, we are working with stk modified weights, g force weights and heavy hitters, all are working great. as for the engine dyno...this morning before we started track dyno testing, we were finalizing the kit on the engine dyno, we confirmed that the yamcharger is all ready at a positive boost pressure at 2800 rpms, by 5000 rpms it has .5 pounds of boost, and continues to climb to a max boost pressure of 2 pounds, throttle response is better than stock due to the building of boost at such low rpms. the power is smooth and linear with a horsepower peak of 168 at 10,800 rpms, and a torque peak of 90 ft lbs around 9500 rpms.
in the next day we will be dynoing a stock apex, and then installing the pc3, ignition, and airbox mod on the same sled to be dynod again. we dynoed a customers sled with the air box mod, pc3, and ign module all ready on it, but it only made 152 hp (4 hp gain over stock) which i thought was a little low, so in the interest of giving the kit the fairest evaluation possible, we decided to re run the test to see a before and after result on the same sled in case the customers sled we dynod was not working up to its full potential. jeff
testing is finished,
we took the two baseline sleds to a radar run and also did some side by side drag racing.
just to recap....these two sleds ran side by side as stock sleds, then one of them was modified with a power commander 3, air box mod, timing advance, and an exhaust mod, it would now beat the other sled by 2.5-3.0 sled lengths in a 700 ft drag race in snow. the same kit was then installed in the other test sled and they now ran side by side again.
we returned one of the sleds to completely stock and then we installed the yamcharger and began testing.
we made 168 hp on the engine dyno, and 94 horsepower to the track on our track dyno.
thats a 20 horsepower gain at the engine, and a 16 horse power gain to the track.
now we took both sleds to the radar run at the sheboygan marsh for a unbiased radar gun test
the pc3 modified sled ran 84 mph in 660 ft
the yamcharger sled ran 89.5 mph in 660 ft
very impressive gains over a sled that was all ready modified.
next we ran them from a dead stop drag race, the yamcharger easily put seven sled lengths on the other sled in a 700 ft drag race in snow
then we went from a side by side roll on and the yamcharger would effortlessly pull away from the other sled
these yamchargers are for real, they work excellent.
they are in stock and ready to ship,
the cost is 2200.00 canadian.
we will also reprogram and support your power commanders for free if you purchase your yamcharger from Simons CPR
final pc3 results on 2006-2010 yamacharged apexs...we ended up making a much broader power band by adding the pc3 and the ignition module. the true horsepower peak moved up to 11,000 rpms and gave us around three extra horsepower. we ran it out to 11,500 rpms and only lost 2 horsepower running it that far past the power peak. the addition of the pc3 and ignition module will give you the ability to overrev the engine acouple of hundred rpms with little to no power loss for conditions that would normally tickle the start of the rev limiter...(10,800 rpms)... and drastically killl the power. (stock rev limiter starts to retard timing at 10,800 rpms and kills it at 11,200.......where our program allows full spark until 11,500 rpms) all in all the power commander adds improved throttle response, more peak horsepower, and a much broader power curve.
we are currently testing our 2011 apex, and will release those results when testing is finalized. please feel free to call us with any questions... 1-414-698-6611 Jeff Simon / Simons CPR
mr.pitstop
Expert
how bout that for numbers... LOL..
I just installed mine and the lake just froze over a couple days ago. I need some trail tuning time to get the clutching perfect for my riding. Then I'll take it out with the stalker II and see what numbers I can pull with my 300lbs on it and then with my wifes 115lbs and see what she'll do..
I just installed mine and the lake just froze over a couple days ago. I need some trail tuning time to get the clutching perfect for my riding. Then I'll take it out with the stalker II and see what numbers I can pull with my 300lbs on it and then with my wifes 115lbs and see what she'll do..
RTX Rox
Pro
SledFreak said:
Sled Freak,
I was looking for numbers not translations from Dream-0-meter to radar.
Grader's Quote
"it bloody well better. my stretched 05 rx (136) did 116 on radar and my buds shorty did 119. but then ive been told mine is exceptional so that helps. stock apexes run 120-123 so adding 20 hp better do something except lighten your wallet."
You come to the Huntsville / Haliburton area and run your stockers that run 120-123 MPH through my Lie Detector Gun. I've owned 3 Apex's from 06 - 10's that with minor clutching and extra air run between 110-115 MPH. I've yet to see one roll out of the box that run anywhere past 110MPH on the gun.
SledFreak
TY 4 Stroke God
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2005
- Messages
- 5,514
- Location
- Ontario. Canada
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- Current 2020 ThunderCat. - SOLD!
RTX Rox said:
that was not dream meter, but radar speed 133.6 on the gun... Re-read the post... it was my old sled and i cut the speedo gear, by one tooth, so the speedo is not that far...
Similar threads
