• We are no longer supporting TapaTalk as a mobile app for our sites. The TapaTalk App has many issues with speed on our server as well as security holes that leave us vulnerable to attacks and spammers.

Cobra Track


.00135 seconds quicker 60' times then a 9830
.00216 seconds quicker 60' times then a ripsaw

.236 seconds quicker in 500' then a 9830
.311 seconds quicker then a ripsaw in 500'

.59 mph faster then a 9830 in 1/4 mile
.12 mph faster then a ripsaw in 1/4 mile

1.4 mph faster top end then a 9830
.5 mph fster top end then a ripsaw





Sorry Jason...FTA is down tonight & I am bored!!!
 
its the most aggressive 1.25ish track money can buy right now. It loves soft snow, and shovels like a mad-man. It made my 500SS an absolute rocket off the line, and it was all because of the track.
I ordered my 144 Cobra for my XTX for $425.
 
Turk said:
.00135 seconds quicker 60' times then a 9830
.00216 seconds quicker 60' times then a ripsaw

.236 seconds quicker in 500' then a 9830
.311 seconds quicker then a ripsaw in 500'

.59 mph faster then a 9830 in 1/4 mile
.12 mph faster then a ripsaw in 1/4 mile

1.4 mph faster top end then a 9830
.5 mph fster top end then a ripsaw





Sorry Jason...FTA is down tonight & I am bored!!!


Mike did you do these tests yourself? That is really good data
 
Can anyone confirm that the cobra's top end is as good as the ripsaw. I've heard this claim but never really heard anyone go from one track to the other to confirm this?? I would like one on my xtx as well.
 
Sorry guys

data is made up....but...2 of us went from ripsaws to cobra,s(nytro & apex) & found better all-around performance with zero loss of top end!!!
 
Turk said:
.00135 seconds quicker 60' times then a 9830
.00216 seconds quicker 60' times then a ripsaw

.236 seconds quicker in 500' then a 9830
.311 seconds quicker then a ripsaw in 500'

.59 mph faster then a 9830 in 1/4 mile
.12 mph faster then a ripsaw in 1/4 mile

1.4 mph faster top end then a 9830
.5 mph fster top end then a ripsaw





Sorry Jason...FTA is down tonight & I am bored!!!


There's no way, the cobra a 1.35" vs a 1.25" ripsaw finger has a faster top end!!!! No way!!!!
 

Attachments

  • Turbo 001.jpg
    Turbo 001.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 68
  • Turbo 002.jpg
    Turbo 002.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 72
  • Turbo 003.jpg
    Turbo 003.jpg
    77.2 KB · Views: 65
The Cobra only actually measures 1.352" on the outside lugs of the track. The inner lugs of the track measure 1.24". The track provides excellent traction and has no loss in top end over the Ripsaw. A much better track all around IMO.
 
I bought this track as well and was wondering what length studs to use, are the 1.325 long enough(woodys)??
 
I think Rich or Ulmer would be a better choice since they help the site out....

please refrain from promoting other site on this site or you will be removed as a member.
 
Ok the cobra sounds like a great track, but like everthings in life there positives and negatives.

So that being said I would guess that on hard pack snow the riPsaw would be superier cause it would just bight into the snow!!!
 


Back
Top