Laban
Extreme
Reliability if of course probably the biggest problem for 2 stroke engines but there are other problems. Ski Doo likes to talk about their SDI engines and that they're just as environmental friendly as the 4-strokes, but the truth is a bit different:
http://forum.snowrider.se/uploads/20070 ... 07_600.JPG
The SDI has pretty good CO emissions compared to the other twostrokes (and the RS, which has rather high CO emissions for a four-stroke) but it's not even close when it comes to HC. To the RS's defense, it's a carburated engine and those will soon be extinct.
Anyway, how about if we add a 3-way catalytic converted to the four-stroke (impossible on a two-stroke) ? Well, take another 90% off from the numbers in the chart. Add then the fact that the EPA-2012 rules are rather weak:
http://www.earthjustice.org/news/press/ ... cient.html
Now, let's look at the Euro 3 standards which have been in place since 2001. We'll take the nr's for the MC category since they have close to the same engines afa performance/cc/weight goes:
Euro 3 - 2001 - greater than 50cc: 4 stroke.
CO: 67
HC: 68
NO: 13
EPA 2012:
HC: 75
HC+NO: N/A (not regulated)
CO: 200
Looser rules 11 years later !!! No wonder that the government thinks the EPA 2012 rules are somewhat of a joke.
http://forum.snowrider.se/uploads/20070 ... 07_600.JPG
The SDI has pretty good CO emissions compared to the other twostrokes (and the RS, which has rather high CO emissions for a four-stroke) but it's not even close when it comes to HC. To the RS's defense, it's a carburated engine and those will soon be extinct.
Anyway, how about if we add a 3-way catalytic converted to the four-stroke (impossible on a two-stroke) ? Well, take another 90% off from the numbers in the chart. Add then the fact that the EPA-2012 rules are rather weak:
http://www.earthjustice.org/news/press/ ... cient.html
Yet the agency's 2002 snowmobile standards -- which will not be fully implemented until 2012 -- do not even require manufacturers to use technology that is already available. In fact, the standards allow nearly one-third of the snowmobiles manufactured in 2012 to be almost as dirty and noisy as those being made today
Now, let's look at the Euro 3 standards which have been in place since 2001. We'll take the nr's for the MC category since they have close to the same engines afa performance/cc/weight goes:
Euro 3 - 2001 - greater than 50cc: 4 stroke.
CO: 67
HC: 68
NO: 13
EPA 2012:
HC: 75
HC+NO: N/A (not regulated)
CO: 200
Looser rules 11 years later !!! No wonder that the government thinks the EPA 2012 rules are somewhat of a joke.