While EFI can have problems, so can carbs. I would venture to guess that the statistics would show a higher level of reliability with EFI than Carbs all problems considered.
Granted the repair can be expensive but what is that likelihood. How many trucks of your model have had that problem 0.001%?? Between the efficiency gained in fuel economy and the lack of other carb related maintenance believe the costs of operation to be lower.
Just the control of richness during cold start alone is huge. How many engines have been melted down due to improper warm up? If your joy in life is tuning, the technology required to allow this is more expensive, but available.
For the masses, EFI is the way of the future, when my wife gets a Yamy with it, I will no longer have to hear about her sore thumb!!!
Granted the repair can be expensive but what is that likelihood. How many trucks of your model have had that problem 0.001%?? Between the efficiency gained in fuel economy and the lack of other carb related maintenance believe the costs of operation to be lower.
Just the control of richness during cold start alone is huge. How many engines have been melted down due to improper warm up? If your joy in life is tuning, the technology required to allow this is more expensive, but available.
For the masses, EFI is the way of the future, when my wife gets a Yamy with it, I will no longer have to hear about her sore thumb!!!
sledheadgeorge
TY 4 Stroke God
Sorry guys but if you want more power you need more fossil fuel. Carbs are still king on the track