SharkAttak said:
how much top end will you lose if you gear down on the Attak, right now i'm getting awesome numbers on the ice with stock gearing
What's your goal? If you want the best performance for ice runs then why would you gear down? I'd leave it alone. By the same token if you are a trail rider at heart and occasionally do an ice run then a gear-down might be in the works for you. When selecting a gear ratio think about how you ride...the performance envelope that you run in. Your weight, elevation, track size, paddle size, riding preference i.e. trail, lake-runs, mountain...all should be factored in to what gearing you go with. Know where you are at and know where you want to go to. Example: My sled is geared slightly tall from the factory. I've seen taller. I calculated the theoretical top-end to be about 110mph with a 1:1 full shift. Problem is I'm a trail rider, spending most of my time at 5 to 65mph. With gearing that goes to 110 to 115 can you see that when I'm trail riding that my belt will be working the lower third of the primary? That's not running very efficiently. In fact I'll end up grooving my sheaves and going through belts very quickly and generating excess heat which is energy that will never make it to the track. Bottom line: Don't change for the sake of changing. Think about where you're at and the mission you want to accomplish. FYI: Most people are not geared efficiently based on how they ride. Prematurely worn clutches and belts are dead giveaways. Good Luck!