UPsledder
Extreme
I have been studding sleds for years as well and I agree with Swiss Sledder on this one.Swiss Sledder said:Dirk, the advantage of 96 studs has nothing to do with cost of the studs themselves. The majority of problems with studded tracks comes from the studs in the outside of the center belt. The other advantage of 96 studs is that they will provide you with sufficient traction to stop on icy surfaces, yet still give you the ability to slide the back end around in the corners.
All I am pointing out is that the number of studs to install is a personal decision and there is no one size fits all.
4Fighter
TY 4 Stroke God
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2003
- Messages
- 1,792
- Reaction score
- 18
- Points
- 943
- Location
- Sault, MI
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- '07 Attak GT
sj said:you really think they would have hit? 1.325's?
I was skeptical, and I didn't think they (1.325) would, but they scratched the cooler, and tore the heat shield so that's why I put the strips in. Now that was with an Expert-X though. Conversely, my buddy studded his attak without added protection and mutilated the die-cast tunnel pc. The track stretched on him, and I think he was bottoming pretty hard without that heavy spring.
Apex_GT
Expert
I'm running 96 studs down the center..I'm completely happy with this..No wear and studs in great shape..I have studded the outside before and blown several tracks this way..My personal preference is controllable slides..Not being glued down in the rear..
studs are heavy.im going to try an ice ripper track on my attack gt this season.more for saftey than performance.
SledFreak
TY 4 Stroke God
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2005
- Messages
- 5,511
- Reaction score
- 465
- Points
- 1,733
- Location
- Ontario. Canada
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- Current 2020 ThunderCat. - SOLD!
The ice ripper track is not near as safe as studs. Don't kid yourself.... Studs are longer and can dig deeper than an Ice ripper track.snappy said:studs are heavy.im going to try an ice ripper track on my attack gt this season.more for saftey than performance.
4Fighter
TY 4 Stroke God
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2003
- Messages
- 1,792
- Reaction score
- 18
- Points
- 943
- Location
- Sault, MI
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- '07 Attak GT
SledFreak said:The ice ripper track is not near as safe as studs. Don't kid yourself.... Studs are longer and can dig deeper than an Ice ripper track.snappy said:studs are heavy.im going to try an ice ripper track on my attack gt this season.more for saftey than performance.
I could be wrong, but last I heard, the studs on the Ice Ripper were NOT replaceable either.
dirkdiggler
Suspended
To each his own. It's all preferance. But it's a clear fact that if you run fewer studs they will wear out faster. This is do to the fact that the leas you use the more stress each individual studs takes. It's a mathmatical fact.
Apex_GT
Expert
Well does your mathematical fact take into consideration the stud on the outside being close to a tear point...huh huh didn't think so..
dirkdiggler
Suspended
Who said anything about studding on the outside??? Go back and read my posts or do a little research buddy. You can run 144 down the center belt on a 121 and 162 down the center belt on a 136 with the use of double backers.
LOL



LOL


Similar threads
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.