• We are no longer supporting TapaTalk as a mobile app for our sites. The TapaTalk App has many issues with speed on our server as well as security holes that leave us vulnerable to attacks and spammers.

why simmons

Dano said:
Rotax! said:
I'm not sure about this, but those simmons skis are the same as doo's precision skis? If they are, which I think they are, they are junk for just about everything. Lots of guys on Dootalk complained that they could not turn them in powder at all, because they have no keel. I have used them for groomed trail and I don't find them that good there because as soon as the trail gets a little soft or sloppy, especially in the corners, they float on the snow and don't turn at all. I have never tried the Yamaha ski's, but I'm willing to give them a try this year. I only ride groomed trails....


Yep...I’m curios about this as well. How can one ski be that good and the other not. They are close enough the same to have a patent infringement.
Yes, if the patent had been infringed, then they have to be very close in design, as well as, the way they perform. I've tried C&A and for groomed trail riding, they just have way too much keel and you need arms like popeye to turn your sled. The duel runners can be a little stiff, if you have big runners on them. I had a pair of flex skis on my REV and they worked good, but they darted alot. It would turn and they would not float like the Precisions. I'm going to give the Yamies a try and put a good set of Woody's executive series, 8 or 10" carbides and see how they work. The editor from snowtech magazine sent me an email before saying the best all around ski is the SLT straight Line Tracking ski. If I can find the email I will post it.
 

The precision were a poor copy of the Simmons, not as wide, different carbide placement and garbage material on the precisions.

jim
 
greenmachine said:
The precision were a poor copy of the Simmons, not as wide, different carbide placement and garbage material on the precisions.

jim
Jim's right on the money with this comment.
 
what kind of condition I ride ?

I ride mostly mnt with some trail playing on the way and our trails are rough , we don't have the luxury of groomers in Alaska ,(the last frontier) . Not to rob the thread but , if I stick with the Apex MNT ski's and buy a nice set of carbides which would everyone recommend , Are the Woody dooly's very good, better than a single carbide , and are they heavy ? I've also seen some that had 3 carbides on one rod , one in center and two on the edge of the rod so when it leans they touch ? Are these any good ?
 
Rotax! said:
I'm not sure about this, but those simmons skis are the same as doo's precision skis? If they are, which I think they are, they are junk for just about everything. Lots of guys on Dootalk complained that they could not turn them in powder at all, because they have no keel. quote]
The Simmons skis have ridges on the bottom that prevent ice from building up unlike the Doo skis. My Simmons are way better in the powder because they are wider and the skis stay on top of the snow, allowing you to turn much better. I have not found that they lack of a deep keel had an adverse impact on turning in powder.
 
Rotax! said:
Yes, if the patent had been infringed, then they have to be very close in design, as well as, the way they perform. I've tried .....

No, that is not how patents work and this is not what people do to get around patents. What Simmons probably has patents on are the carbides at the edges, the micro edges on the bottom, the sliding rear point of the ski loop, and possibly the exact design of the concave bottom.

Things that are not patentable are widths, fore and aft placements of the carbides and so on.

Even the casual observer can see from the website that the ski has patents on it. So what Ski-Doo did, is take what they wanted and yet make a number of things quite different, so they could attempt to say it is a completely different ski which it really is. Yet they did get nailed for stealing key ideas.

It is so nice that the little guy won especially since his ski is alot better :Rockon:
 
Simmons "flexi" ski doesn't get iced up in the tunnel because every time the ski flexes, the ice falls out.

Key differences between simmons and doo:
- Flexibility - +simmons
- tunnel width - +simmons
- tunnel depth - +simmons.

With a very shallow tunnel, the doo skis have a very hard time biting. They had to go with a shallow tunnel to reduce the ice buildup as an alternative to adding flexibility, which they figured would be just too blatant of a copy. Still builds ice though.

Heh heh, one more thing. My buddy has a doo rev 800 ho with stock skis. He was asking me where to get simmons skis 'cause he really liked them.
 
simmons are nice ski's,but it seems everyone with the rev platform dosen't care for them,it must be the just that chasis.
 
I have a buddy with a Rev. He spends alot of time on dootalk. Everyone says precisions are garbage. He bought a set of single runner ski doo skis.

He does not like them at all....he put the precisions back on.

The darting was driving him crazy.

The precisions did not have alot of bite in the corners in loose snow....but they did not dart!
 
BlueByYou2000 said:
milkman said:
Ordered a attak this spring ,and I keep reading about guys putting on simmons skis. what is the reason for this? Wondering if they are somthing I should be looking at?

Let us know in what conditions you do most of your riding?
I do 99% of my riding on grommed trails ,had a rev with persision skis on front before didn,t realy like them .I found they darted terrible when following someone with the same ski.Maybe simmons are better this way can you guys help?
Thanks milkman
 


Back
Top