billey100
Pro
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2007
- Messages
- 181
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 696
- Location
- Seneca Falls NY
- Website
- lusecannon.wordpress.com
grizztracks said:Yamaporn said:belt life is not the point. That unnecessary aluminum plate is the point. It was that shield that caused the damage, not the belt. As far as the dealer can tell, the bottom plate serves no useful purpose. As a previous poster pointed out, there are 2 plates. The bottom one caused the problem, and is completely unnecessary.
The bottom line is that belts fail. 500 miles, 5000 miles, who knows they just do. The post was to make us aware of a possible problem which yamaporn did. Take the information and do what you want but don't bust someone for posting or giving their 2 cents.
Thanks for the info.
Sorry billey100 but a good engineer always should research every conceivable scenario. That's what engineers do!
I hear ya Grizz what they should and want to do isnt really always whats in the budget.
I think it is important that people know for sure that this happened. I am just saying the way he said it as if that plate was totally useless is a statement that he obviously knows nothing about besides what his dealer is saying. Why cant you just get on here and say hey my belt blew and from hitting that plate it caused more damage. Adding that its a piece of #*$&@ plate and should have never been there is a little far. I personally had the wet boot and had my dealer put the plate in and now I have no wet boot so it obviously does something.
I too change my belt each year for piece of mind but thats not really helping him in this situation.