• We are no longer supporting TapaTalk as a mobile app for our sites. The TapaTalk App has many issues with speed on our server as well as security holes that leave us vulnerable to attacks and spammers.

Hi boost w/ low comp vs stck comp w/ low boost?

Yamanator

Expert
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
302
Age
61
Location
Oxford,Mi
Country
USA
Snowmobile
2017 Sidewinder LTX LE
Which one is better guy's? I am running 7 pounds with a S/C with stock compression and love it for my application, but might be rebuilding the motor and would like some suggestions on which way to go. Its my understanding you lose a little power by going with the low compression pistons and 10 pounds of boost. Give me your thought's.

:Rockon:
 

Yamanator said:
Which one is better guy's? I am running 7 pounds with a S/C with stock compression and love it for my application, but might be rebuilding the motor and would like some suggestions on which way to go. Its my understanding you lose a little power by going with the low compression pistons and 10 pounds of boost. Give me your thought's.

:Rockon:

It will take about 1 lb of boost to make up for the lost compression, should not be too noticable with a supercharger since there is boost available instantly.

It will show up in lost fuel mileage though.

Ted.
 
It would be great if someone had some actuall dyno sheets from a supercharged sled at 7 pounds, and then at 10 pounds with the low compression piston's ! Maybe some of you shop owners could look through some of you're record's and see if you have done any of these sled's set up in this way. Just a thought............. ;)!
 
Yamanator said:
It would be great if someone had some actuall dyno sheets from a supercharged sled at 7 pounds, and then at 10 pounds with the low compression piston's ! Maybe some of you shop owners could look through some of you're record's and see if you have done any of these sled's set up in this way. Just a thought............. ;)!


10 psi with 10-1 would be slower but safer I wouldnt do pistons for 3 psi..
 
onestopjim said:
Yamanator said:
It would be great if someone had some actuall dyno sheets from a supercharged sled at 7 pounds, and then at 10 pounds with the low compression piston's ! Maybe some of you shop owners could look through some of you're record's and see if you have done any of these sled's set up in this way. Just a thought............. ;)!


10 psi with 10-1 would be slower but safer I wouldnt do pistons for 3 psi..

I agree I would just stack 2 gaskets.

Ted.
 
last 2 years I ran 10psi blower on a stock motor RX-1 no pistons or gaskets and no trouble but I always used race fuel 110 straight . I think that one is as fast or faster than my Apex running 15psi and 10:1 pistons. The RX had 2000 miles of total abuse and the guy I sold it to drives the same and it still runs perfect
 
tko47 said:
last 2 years I ran 10psi blower on a stock motor RX-1 no pistons or gaskets and no trouble but I always used race fuel 110 straight . I think that one is as fast or faster than my Apex running 15psi and 10:1 pistons. The RX had 2000 miles of total abuse and the guy I sold it to drives the same and it still runs perfect

tko,do you know Chad who race's Ski-doo sled's out of Minneapolis?
That is who I bought my burgandy 05 RX from with the MPI on it.

:Rockon:
 


Back
Top