Fellas, I needs your input for the whole Phazer topic. To get the background up front, today I was at my buddy's place. He pulled his sled out of hibernation and we did a couple of straight runs up and down the back field. He has a 2011 MXZ 600 TNT (2 stroke) carbureted model. The best I can find for specs is that for the most part, speaking in dimensions the MXZ is fairly similar to the Phazer. On a numbers to numbers sheet the MXZ to Phazer is...
- about 103 HP / 80 HP
- lighter by 71 lbs at a claimed 408 lbs vs. 489 lbs
- runs a 15" wide track vs 14" wide
- and is a 2 stroke vs 4-stroke.
Those are the only major numerical differences I could find. What I learned about it was the MXZ was the following...
- it seemed to need a bit of a high RPM to get it moving from idle but also seemed to me, to have a bit too aggressive of a take off, like the clutch setup needed tuning to be more immediate to engage rather than rev up and snap the sled into motion from being static
- good power, I would say about all I would need
- I understand the ski darting issues now, I have read about it with the Phazer and his MXZ does it quite easily
- I appreciate the "rider up" positioning of the seating arrangement more than a fixed 90 degree style of seating
It was enough of an experience though to make me think that I could find some pleasure in going for a nice, snow stormy trail ride. So I am going to work on figuring out ways that will allow me afford the Phazer mentioned at the start of this thread, the 2009 RTX. It has somewhat higher mileage on it at a little over 13,000 kms, but I have read plenty of reports that say these 500 engines will go for well over 30,000 kms so I'm not worried about that. My concerns now are, will the Phazer be comparable in power to the MXZ given the two very different engines? I know the type of power output is a whole different animal between the two platforms meaning 2 stroke to 4 stroke. I'm not interested in racing of any sort but my reason for asking is because the MXZ is about the power range I would like to be in based on the very little experience I had. To me it is plenty to go for a nice trail ride but still have some sleeper power behind it to just open it up and get a touch of adrenaline going or maybe catch up if I find myself appreciating the scenery more than keeping up
The next concern is for when I go to look at this sled. Regardless of mileage, any sled could tag a hidden rock and do damages that are not easily seen from the outside...or from inside the engine compartment with how well these engines are tucked in there. What areas would you guys be paying more attention to than not? I know to check the following...
- bushings in the ski components
- carbides and sliders
- track clips and track dry rot, cords fraying out or fiberglass rods popping out...although I still have to see what these rods look like to know for sure what to look for
- steering slop, spindle wear and tie rod boots if it has them
- bogey bearing slop and flat spots on the bogeys
- if I can see it, check for flat spots on the belt and look for oil/coolant leaks
- shock bushings and rebound effect
- skid spring tension
- A-arm bushings
- dents in the A-arms and distance between the shock and A-arm tubes for differences to indicate any impacts have happened
- check for any visible bulkhead damage and uneven body panel lines and spacing
Is there anything I am missing? What have you experienced through time that you would consider to be important check list items? Don't forget the above MXZ referencing question too

Thanks for any suggestions and info you can offer.