Let's keep the EPA out of this all together. We do not want them or any other entity to screw up more than they already have.
northernsledder.jk said:Let's keep the EPA out of this all together. We do not want them or any other entity to screw up more than they already have.
Those dirty two-strokes maybe around for a while yet.One thing that might hurt the bi-polar sled makers is the MPG average(one poster on dootalk claims this is why ski-doo will not tune more power out of the 1200).Yamaha will no doubt have something major,but im starting to think that doo/poo/and even cat will only have BNG for 2014.AKrider said:northernsledder.jk said:Let's keep the EPA out of this all together. We do not want them or any other entity to screw up more than they already have.
We wouldn't have 4-stroke sleds if not for the EPA. From what I understand they backed off their regs and went to a fleet average after '12. If they had kept going the route they were on, 2-strokes, even the eTech, would have eventually been a thing of the past simply because a 2-stroke has to burn oil and some goes out the exhaust pipe. We'd be on track to have huge leaps in bounds in development of 4-strokes that would eventually eclipse the light weight handling advantage of today's 2-strokes.
I agree the Nytro motor even w/o a turbo in a Procross type chassis would be my next sled for sure. For the record my Cat ices up pretty bad at the back of the tunnel. Not quite as bad as the Nytro but close.meskie said:I'm not a brand loyal kool-aid drinking Yamaha die hard. People were talking how good the cat turbos were. All I was saying is when you compare a cat to a Yamaha turbo. The Yamaha motor is more responsive. As for racing distance we were driving across open fields that were a mile long so I don't know what distance he caught and passed me at. Even against a 240hp chipped cat and I have less money into it than a 1100t cat. If cat would have had the current line up when I bought my Yamaha and if the dealer was closer I would be driving a cat. If the put a turboed nytro motor in a cat chassis I think it would be an awesome sled
jp111 said:dilligaf said:brad d said:http://www.ty4stroke.com/viewtopic.php?t=116810
8500$ nytro.. something must be coming
Looks like I unloaded my FxNytro just in time (last night). Not replacing it until maybe next year depending on the snow. No snow, no new trail sled.
That's good for you, but this "FIRE" sale stuff is going to beat up the used values. You cant sell your old sled for more or even close to what they are asking for a "new leftover" I just hope there is not a crap ton of them in the market so values will eventually creep back up to some sort of normalcy.
I want a new sled for next season , but like most riders cant afford to lose my pants on the one I have currently.
There are about 200 people who work on sleds designs for yamaha in japan.And i bet like Honda,there are moved around the company to work on other projects(ATVs,motorcycles,PWCs,etc).It may seem that yamaha are slow to change but the way they see it, if the powertrain is fine,why bother trying to keep changing the chassis.R&D cost have to be recouperated and that means sticking to a chassis design for a while.Yamaha has the most chassis designs of the big four,but this reflects yamahas intent to make a unique chassis for each HP class.But it hurts them putting all resources into one chassis like the rest.(Why you think cat,poo,doo can update a chassis so quick?) .I recall last season one of the yamaha factory hillclimb racers responding to trashtalk about yamahas effort in the mountain market.He said something about "the competition will be accusing yamaha of bringing guns to a knife fight"when they see whats comingAKrider said:My buddy was telling me they changed that for '13. He doesn't have the heat exchanger at the very back of the tunnel. I recall reading that Cat had a humped tunnel last year and ice was forming between the top of the exchanger and the top of the tunnel. That design caused the top of the tunnel to get bent from what I understand. The '12 Cat 800 that was with us had an aftermarket fix that made the tunnel flat at the back. I didn't check his tunnel for ice.
The thing I like is Cat along with Polaris and Doo acknowledge and address a majority of their problems and improve their sleds year after year. Polaris has made big improvements to their a-arm front end around 4 times in the past 8 years. Ski-doo has continued to improve the XP and now has the best riding skid in the R-motion. If Yamaha would do that they'd really have some great sleds in their existing models. I've never understood why they are so slow to make big and needed improvements? Their engines and clutches are excellent. All they need to focus on is their chassis. They actually have less work cut out for them than the other OEM's.
AKrider said:My buddy was telling me they changed that for '13. He doesn't have the heat exchanger at the very back of the tunnel. I recall reading that Cat had a humped tunnel last year and ice was forming between the top of the exchanger and the top of the tunnel. That design caused the top of the tunnel to get bent from what I understand. The '12 Cat 800 that was with us had an aftermarket fix that made the tunnel flat at the back. I didn't check his tunnel for ice.
The thing I like is Cat along with Polaris and Doo acknowledge and address a majority of their problems and improve their sleds year after year. Polaris has made big improvements to their a-arm front end around 4 times in the past 8 years. Ski-doo has continued to improve the XP and now has the best riding skid in the R-motion. If Yamaha would do that they'd really have some great sleds in their existing models. I've never understood why they are so slow to make big and needed improvements? Their engines and clutches are excellent. All they need to focus on is their chassis. They actually have less work cut out for them than the other OEM's.