• We are no longer supporting TapaTalk as a mobile app for our sites. The TapaTalk App has many issues with speed on our server as well as security holes that leave us vulnerable to attacks and spammers.

apex VS attack

Accelleration goes to the Attak in most cases. Top end shouldn't be off too much but remember on an Attak you will get there quicker :ORC
 

mclarenyamaha said:
have any one tried this out in the field. teory is one thing. real life its another.
With my Warrior yes. I don't see why the 06's would be any different.
 
Steve - You just saw how much fun I was having on the Nytro!

I thought you were going to wet yourself, seeing me go thru the bumps, corners, and driveway approaches. I saw the smile on your face, and could hear you laughing.

IT WAS GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
NOS-PRO said:
Steve - You just saw how much fun I was having on the Nytro!

I thought you were going to wet yourself,...
Yeah, that's pretty much why I almost bought one, I'm not sure I can handle that much fun at my relatively advanced age. :wink:
 
SledderSteve said:
..... at my relatively advanced age. :wink:

If that's the case, where the HE## does that leave ME ???? LaLaLa
 
Naw.........that was pointing at Terry and laughing, eh? ;)!
 
mclarenyamaha said:
has anyone tried the apex compeard to the attak in the real life. and how big was the diffrense between them in top end and acceleration. and how is the 06 attak compeard to 05 warrior in handling. could some of the testpilots give us their seriuos experiense. some of them who really tried them.

I’ve tried them both and still having a hard time deciding. I did notice the Attak had better traction in the loose conditions we were in and had great weight transfer. I also really liked the RTX and thought that would be my final decision after the test day was done. Maybe an RTX with a 136 skid?-but the Attak looks great in red as well! :o| Didn’t really notice push in the corners with the Attak, but I will be studding and could imagine more push then the 121 shorty. I quess its all about small compromises, but the ride quality and traction might be my deciding factor. I’ve tried many performance setups on my RX-1 shorty and always found myself limited for traction. I can always put a lower profile track on if I want more top end speed...
I’ve had 4 other sleds with the 136 tracks and might be time to get back after the 121's of my SRX and RX-1. I’ll be checking them out again this weekend and will decide :drink: and do my purchase next week. Really can’t go wrong with either one....

Dan
 
I also like the wide running boards on a 136" set up that run back further due to the longer track! Feels wider and roomier than a 121" IMO. ;)!
 
LazyBastard said:
zoomzoom said:
LazyBastard said:
More track is NEVER the wrong choice.

right... till you try to turn that bus around the corner as quick as you're buddy who's riding the GT

Well, by buddy with a Rev800 can't seem to keep up with me, so I have to conclude that you're full of sh*t.

You're the one that's full of sh*t if you think you can turn a 136 as quick as I can turn a 121. Again, its basic physics!

Anytime I've addressed someone in this forum regardless of whether or I've agreed with that person I've always posted in a respectable manner.

LB - this is the second time in less than a week that I've noticed you just can't seem to post without having to insult someone. I don't care how many posts you have under your name. You still need a lesson in "How to properly communicate in a Forum".
 
LB, do you want to be part of this site??? I have asked you many times to back off...I will not tell you again....Do you want to talk??
 


Back
Top