STAIN
Lifetime Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2004
- Messages
- 4,195
- Location
- Vermont
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2022 SIDEWINDER LTX GT
- LOCATION
- Vermont
Well, I finally put almost 200 miles on my new stage 4 Elka shocks.
I purchased them from Accelerated Technologoies, and they set them up also.
So far not impressive. They are far too stiff. I spent the ride dialing them softer and softer until they were at the end of the adjustment. The rebound was so fast that the front end was bouncing up after a bump. I also have that dialed way back now.
I will call them tomorrow.
I am looking for a "plush" ride. These just seem to be hitting the bumps, not absorbing them. I feel EVERY trail irregularity.
Hopefully I can get this sorted out. I have a lot of $$$$ in these and was hoping for more.
I think I will throw the stock stuff in for next week to compare.
I purchased them from Accelerated Technologoies, and they set them up also.
So far not impressive. They are far too stiff. I spent the ride dialing them softer and softer until they were at the end of the adjustment. The rebound was so fast that the front end was bouncing up after a bump. I also have that dialed way back now.
I will call them tomorrow.
I am looking for a "plush" ride. These just seem to be hitting the bumps, not absorbing them. I feel EVERY trail irregularity.
Hopefully I can get this sorted out. I have a lot of $$$$ in these and was hoping for more.
I think I will throw the stock stuff in for next week to compare.
Stubbs
TY 4 Stroke Master
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Messages
- 1,120
- Age
- 44
- Location
- Uxbridge, On, Can.
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- ‘16 Apex XTX with 137” Mono II
+ other gooodies
- LOCATION
- Uxbridge ON
I like John’s theories and find his videos very informative, but the Vec my father rides has Elka’s all the way around and he’s never been 100% happy with the ride quality of the package. It does handle much better than a stocker, and is likely more capable in the trash, but he’s never found the “plushness” he’s been looking for. To be fair to Accelerated, he purchased the sled used and the setup was already on it, they’ve never been given a chance to optimize the package for him. The previous owner said he’d be blown away with it when he bought the sled, but that hasn’t been the case yet several seasons in.Well, I finally put almost 200 miles on my new stage 4 Elka shocks.
I purchased them from Accelerated Technologoies, and they set them up also.
So far not impressive. They are far too stiff. I spent the ride dialing them softer and softer until they were at the end of the adjustment. The rebound was so fast that the front end was bouncing up after a bump. I also have that dialed way back now.
I will call them tomorrow.
I am looking for a "plush" ride. These just seem to be hitting the bumps, not absorbing them. I feel EVERY trail irregularity.
Hopefully I can get this sorted out. I have a lot of $$$$ in these and was hoping for more.
I think I will throw the stock stuff in for next week to compare.
STAIN
Lifetime Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2004
- Messages
- 4,195
- Location
- Vermont
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2022 SIDEWINDER LTX GT
- LOCATION
- Vermont
I am done hammering through thrashed out trails. Too old. I am looking for comfort.It does handle much better than a stocker, and is likely more capable in the trash,
earthling
Lifetime Member
Well, I finally put almost 200 miles on my new stage 4 Elka shocks.
I purchased them from Accelerated Technologoies, and they set them up also.
So far not impressive. They are far too stiff. I spent the ride dialing them softer and softer until they were at the end of the adjustment. The rebound was so fast that the front end was bouncing up after a bump. I also have that dialed way back now.
I will call them tomorrow.
I am looking for a "plush" ride. These just seem to be hitting the bumps, not absorbing them. I feel EVERY trail irregularity.
Hopefully I can get this sorted out. I have a lot of $$$$ in these and was hoping for more.
I think I will throw the stock stuff in for next week to compare.
The springs are too stiff and no amount of damping adjustment will overcome that, it will only make it worse. If you want 'plush' you want a progressive or dual-rate spring setup that is made for your weight.
1nc 2000
Lifetime Member Tim
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 3,070
- Location
- Marquette, MI
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Yamaha FX Nytro RTX SE
Also the difference in 1,2,3 or 20 clicks of adjustment for compression and rebound can be too much "dialing in " for some people.
Richard Hodgins
Expert
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Messages
- 244
- Age
- 46
- Location
- Ottawa ontario
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- Yamaha powered CAT
I was waiting to hear about your experience! That doesn’t sound promising at all. I ended up getting some QS3R to replace my regular QS3 and noticed a big difference on my 2022 LTX gt. Dialing the rebound in, I was able to smooth out the ride over the bumps. It is plush!Well, I finally put almost 200 miles on my new stage 4 Elka shocks.
I purchased them from Accelerated Technologoies, and they set them up also.
So far not impressive. They are far too stiff. I spent the ride dialing them softer and softer until they were at the end of the adjustment. The rebound was so fast that the front end was bouncing up after a bump. I also have that dialed way back now.
I will call them tomorrow.
I am looking for a "plush" ride. These just seem to be hitting the bumps, not absorbing them. I feel EVERY trail irregularity.
Hopefully I can get this sorted out. I have a lot of $$$$ in these and was hoping for more.
I think I will throw the stock stuff in for next week to compare.
I was wondering if the elkas would be better
STAIN
Lifetime Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2004
- Messages
- 4,195
- Location
- Vermont
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2022 SIDEWINDER LTX GT
- LOCATION
- Vermont
It can be overload. With that many positions of adjustment I find myself fiddling all the time.Also the difference in 1,2,3 or 20 clicks of adjustment for compression and rebound can be too much "dialing in " for some people.
This is what I am thinking also but all my springs are set at minimum preload so the only adjustments I had where compression and rebound.The springs are too stiff and no amount of damping adjustment will overcome that, it will only make it worse.
my front tender springs are 9.4x45 and the mains are 2.7x254
front track shock springs are tender 9.4x45 main3.6x127
#20 left torsion only.
Maybe I need to set them at the stock positons and just start over.
Last edited:
earthling
Lifetime Member
It can be overload. With that many positions of adjustment I find myself fiddling all the time.
This is what I am thinking also but all my springs are set at minimum preload so the only adjustments I had where compression and rebound.
my front tender springs are 9.4x45 and the mains are 2.7x254
front track shock springs are tender 9.4x45 main3.6x127
#20 left torsion only.
Maybe I need to set them at the stock positons and just start over.
Are you sure about those rates. Sitting in a restaurant but assuming you mean kg/mm thats like 117lb initial rate and 151 secondary rate. That would feel stiff, much stiffer than stock if I remember right.
If those are lbs its probably blowing right through the tender into the stiff main spring.
Sag dictates the position of the shock within its working travel length. Too much spring will leave too little room for shock extension, too little and you will be further into the shock travel. For a given rider weight, sag should end up in the right position (~30% of total shock travel) in the shock extension. John has a good video that talks about this. If you set sag for shock length and the sled is too high or low then you may need different springs.
Last edited:
STAIN
Lifetime Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2004
- Messages
- 4,195
- Location
- Vermont
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2022 SIDEWINDER LTX GT
- LOCATION
- Vermont
Yup. That is what is printed on the springs
DennyTuna
RIP-Logan-Dylan-Never forgotten!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2017
- Messages
- 724
- Age
- 62
- Location
- Ohio
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 18 Winder LTX 50th
16 SR Viper RTX (red)
02 SX Viper ER (red)
97 SX Vmax 600 (red)
They are correctAre you sure about those rates. Sitting in a restaurant but assuming you mean kg/mm thats like 117lb initial rate and 151 secondary rate. That would feel stiff, much stiffer than stock if I remember right.
earthling
Lifetime Member
They are correct
That would feel very stiff then. Aren't the stock springs more like 60 initial and 150 final?
DennyTuna
RIP-Logan-Dylan-Never forgotten!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2017
- Messages
- 724
- Age
- 62
- Location
- Ohio
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 18 Winder LTX 50th
16 SR Viper RTX (red)
02 SX Viper ER (red)
97 SX Vmax 600 (red)
It's not at all, I have the same springs on the Winder with QS3r's and the Viper with stage 4 Elka's. Great combo for me on either sled.
DennyTuna
RIP-Logan-Dylan-Never forgotten!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2017
- Messages
- 724
- Age
- 62
- Location
- Ohio
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 18 Winder LTX 50th
16 SR Viper RTX (red)
02 SX Viper ER (red)
97 SX Vmax 600 (red)
60 initial would be way to soft and useless
earthling
Lifetime Member
maybe I did hte math wrong.
60lbs/inch would be 120lbs at 2 inches and 150lbs at 2.5 inches, the winder has 150lbs(ish) on each ski. 117lbs of initial spring rate means you are only compressing the springs a total of 1.2 inches which is too short for the appropriate sag. But I probably did the math wrong, I am sure elka knows what they are doing.
60 initial would be way to soft and useless
60lbs/inch would be 120lbs at 2 inches and 150lbs at 2.5 inches, the winder has 150lbs(ish) on each ski. 117lbs of initial spring rate means you are only compressing the springs a total of 1.2 inches which is too short for the appropriate sag. But I probably did the math wrong, I am sure elka knows what they are doing.
earthling
Lifetime Member
Math was right, that is a stiffer setup.
Let's talk suspension
Thanks Stain. Who did you get your Elka's through? Elka, Accelerated, or Monster? The numbers are translated as follows: Fronts 9.4X45 = 527 lbs/in. rate, 1.77 inches long 2.7X254 = 152 lbs/in. rate, 10 inches long Center 9.4X45 = 527 lbs/in. rate, 1.77 inches long 3.6x127 = 202 lbs/in...
ty4stroke.com
Similar threads
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 8K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 48K
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.