• We are no longer supporting TapaTalk as a mobile app for our sites. The TapaTalk App has many issues with speed on our server as well as security holes that leave us vulnerable to attacks and spammers.

Interesting Skid Shock Spring info

I google the easiest steering ski (mods). They steer easy, but have had them catch hard pack and toss me side to side on my seat. I really miss my powder hounds I might just try the spring and change skis?


2014 viper, mpi
2009 Phazer 144"
 

I google the easiest steering ski (mods). They steer easy, but have had them catch hard pack and toss me side to side on my seat. I really miss my powder hounds I might just try the spring and change skis?


2014 viper, mpi
2009 Phazer 144"

Front skid shock spring and non aggressive skis really helped ours, no more darting. Bear in mind we ride trails with lots of turns and not a lot of straights
 
Got my new add on's. Time to drop the skid. Mostly for the duponts
zbroz.jpg
 
I will do that without a doubt. Ty has guided me now I want to help others.

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk
 
Xtx and Mtx are uncoupled so throughout the travel of front and rear of skid they don't affect each other as dramatically as the coupled 129 and 137 skids which are coupled so that at a certain point when rear is compressed the front skid shock is also compressed. This helps keep front end down for cornering and also increases the effective rate of rear shock since front skid shock is helping it. Think of it like a swaybar for the rear of skid. That is what this mechanism in pic does. I would be a little concerned whether the uncoupled skid rails will be able to handle the extra load.
 
I assume that this would be better for trail riding but might make deep powder riding more difficult? Please correct me if I'm wrong on this. I'm still trying to understand how the rear suspension really works in a sled.
 
Xtx and Mtx are uncoupled so throughout the travel of front and rear of skid they don't affect each other as dramatically as the coupled 129 and 137 skids which are coupled so that at a certain point when rear is compressed the front skid shock is also compressed. This helps keep front end down for cornering and also increases the effective rate of rear shock since front skid shock is helping it. Think of it like a swaybar for the rear of skid. That is what this mechanism in pic does. I would be a little concerned whether the uncoupled skid rails will be able to handle the extra load.
I am also concerned with the coupler being over torqued. I was leaning towards the hygear set up at one point but wasn't really sold on it using the stock shock,which you can use. But you have to increase shock pressure and with just a air shock with hygear setup if you loose a seal the suspension will calapse. Either set up you need to drill holes in the rails. For me this is HOPEFULLY the cheapest way to keep the skis down on the trail.

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk
 
I assume that this would be better for trail riding but might make deep powder riding more difficult? Please correct me if I'm wrong on this. I'm still trying to understand how the rear suspension really works in a sled.
With zbroz set up you can turn the blocks so it will ride like it's uncoupled

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk
 


Back
Top