- Joined
- Apr 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,539
- Location
- Hessel, Michigan
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder, SR Viper XTX, SR Viper XTX, 2016 Apex XTX and Pro-Line Pro Stock 1000
Been meaning to post this and now after installing a clutch kit and checking his offset.....anyone who's offset is not where it should be and you are adding a shim or two on the secondary shaft to get the correct offset from the rear primary sheave to the front secondary sheave, you are also making your belt deflection worse or looser.
If you add washers to the rear of the secondary you will need to add washers to the bolt that holds your secondary on the shaft.
If your offset dimension is too much and you need to remove shims on the back of the secondary, you will probably have a tight belt and you will need to remove washers from the bolt holding the secondary on the shaft.
Secondary adjusters work great in this area
If you add washers to the rear of the secondary you will need to add washers to the bolt that holds your secondary on the shaft.
If your offset dimension is too much and you need to remove shims on the back of the secondary, you will probably have a tight belt and you will need to remove washers from the bolt holding the secondary on the shaft.
Secondary adjusters work great in this area
XP123
TY 4 Stroke Master
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,494
- Age
- 69
- Location
- Chautauqua NY
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder XTX LE 137
Been meaning to post this and now after installing a clutch kit and checking his offset.....anyone who's offset is not where it should be and you are adding a shim or two on the secondary shaft to get the correct offset from the rear primary sheave to the front secondary sheave, you are also making your belt deflection worse or looser.
If you add washers to the rear of the secondary you will need to add washers to the bolt that holds your secondary on the shaft.
If your offset dimension is too much and you need to remove shims on the back of the secondary, you will probably have a tight belt and you will need to remove washers from the bolt holding the secondary on the shaft.
Secondary adjusters work great in this area
How are you guys checking your offset? I hear you don't want more than 61 mm?
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,539
- Location
- Hessel, Michigan
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder, SR Viper XTX, SR Viper XTX, 2016 Apex XTX and Pro-Line Pro Stock 1000
How are you guys checking your offset? I hear you don't want more than 61 mm?
I use a precision ground piece of steel that I made at work. I place the piece of steel on the backside of the primary clutch (new straight edge from a machine square works good also). I make sure the secondary is pushed back tight against the washers behind the secondary and then take a caliper or depth micrometer to measure the distance from the from the front sheave of the secondary down toward the precision ground steel.
Dimension is 58.1-61.1 from Yamaha....but I tell everyone to aim for 61.1mm or 2.405 inch
XP123
TY 4 Stroke Master
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,494
- Age
- 69
- Location
- Chautauqua NY
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder XTX LE 137
Thanks but doesn't the offset change depending on how you have your belt deflection set? If you set yours where the belt sits low the offset will be less and if you set it so the belt rides high the offset will greater right?I use a precision ground piece of steel that I made at work. I place the piece of steel on the backside of the primary clutch (new straight edge from a machine square works good also). I make sure the secondary is pushed back tight against the washers behind the secondary and then take a caliper or depth micrometer to measure the distance from the from the front sheave of the secondary down toward the precision ground steel.
Dimension is 58.1-61.1 from Yamaha....but I tell everyone to aim for 61.1mm or 2.405 inch
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,539
- Location
- Hessel, Michigan
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder, SR Viper XTX, SR Viper XTX, 2016 Apex XTX and Pro-Line Pro Stock 1000
Thanks but doesn't the offset change depending on how you have your belt deflection set? If you set yours where the belt sits low the offset will be less and if you set it so the belt rides high the offset will greater right?
It will, that is why the belt tension should be checked first and then make sure the offset distance is correct.
Someone needs to make a tool that goes from the primary sheave angle to the front of the secondary
XP123
TY 4 Stroke Master
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,494
- Age
- 69
- Location
- Chautauqua NY
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder XTX LE 137
That's what I think needs to happen. The offset should be measured to the outside of the secondary clutch otherwise your measurement can vary depending on your belt condition and belt adjustment. The only set in stone measurement needs to be taken at the secondary stationary sheave. I think measuring at the moveable sheave is a waste of time because once that sheave is off the adjuster that measurement is useless.It will, that is why the belt tension should be checked first and then make sure the offset distance is correct.
Someone needs to make a tool that goes from the primary sheave angle to the front of the secondaryView attachment 135759
krm
Lifetime Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
- Messages
- 859
- Age
- 69
- Location
- ny
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- sidewinder 850 mxz,850xrs 850xrs 900t22Mach Z
I'm going to start floating my driven .
ClutchMaster
HUGE Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
- Messages
- 2,996
- Location
- tomahawk
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2015 Viper 270 hurricane,
2002 Viper W/162 A.C. skid, SRX pipes &CDI, 780 BB
- LOCATION
- Wisconsin
That's what I think needs to happen. The offset should be measured to the outside of the secondary clutch otherwise your measurement can vary depending on your belt condition and belt adjustment. The only set in stone measurement needs to be taken at the secondary stationary sheave. I think measuring at the moveable sheave is a waste of time because once that sheave is off the adjuster that measurement is useless.
It is from back of primary to front of secondary, not sure what you guys are talking about.
ClutchMaster
HUGE Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
- Messages
- 2,996
- Location
- tomahawk
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2015 Viper 270 hurricane,
2002 Viper W/162 A.C. skid, SRX pipes &CDI, 780 BB
- LOCATION
- Wisconsin
It will, that is why the belt tension should be checked first and then make sure the offset distance is correct.
Someone needs to make a tool that goes from the primary sheave angle to the front of the secondaryView attachment 135759
That tool is for checking parallel and offset simultaneously.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,539
- Location
- Hessel, Michigan
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder, SR Viper XTX, SR Viper XTX, 2016 Apex XTX and Pro-Line Pro Stock 1000
That tool is for checking parallel and offset simultaneously.
Yup
I have one for the older style Yamahas and love it for when I move the engine around.
ClutchMaster
HUGE Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
- Messages
- 2,996
- Location
- tomahawk
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2015 Viper 270 hurricane,
2002 Viper W/162 A.C. skid, SRX pipes &CDI, 780 BB
- LOCATION
- Wisconsin
I give bad advice remember.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,539
- Location
- Hessel, Michigan
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder, SR Viper XTX, SR Viper XTX, 2016 Apex XTX and Pro-Line Pro Stock 1000
That's what I think needs to happen. The offset should be measured to the outside of the secondary clutch otherwise your measurement can vary depending on your belt condition and belt adjustment. The only set in stone measurement needs to be taken at the secondary stationary sheave. I think measuring at the moveable sheave is a waste of time because once that sheave is off the adjuster that measurement is useless.
The measurement is to the fixed sheave, but if you have 59.1mm for a dimension, you add 2mm spacer to the back of the secondary on the shaft that will bring the fixed sheave out to meet 61.1mm, the bolt and washers that hold the secondary will not move and will push the helix in and will make your belt tension loose cause it will open up the secondary sheaves on the winder. 2mm will also be needed to the washer lineup on the main secondary bolt.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2003
- Messages
- 6,539
- Location
- Hessel, Michigan
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder, SR Viper XTX, SR Viper XTX, 2016 Apex XTX and Pro-Line Pro Stock 1000
I see what your getting at and how changing offset affects belt deflection. But your still measuring to the stationary sheaves is what I’m saying.
Yes....correct.
Yamaha has it right on the measurement, but they don't say how it will affect belt tension.
XP123
TY 4 Stroke Master
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,494
- Age
- 69
- Location
- Chautauqua NY
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder XTX LE 137
OK so the measurement is to the outside of the fixed secondary sheave? If that is the case then yes that would be accurate and I see no change if you change your belt adjustment right?The measurement is to the fixed sheave, but if you have 59.1mm for a dimension, you add 2mm spacer to the back of the secondary on the shaft that will bring the fixed sheave out to meet 61.1mm, the bolt and washers that hold the secondary will not move and will push the helix in and will make your belt tension loose cause it will open up the secondary sheaves on the winder. 2mm will also be needed to the washer lineup on the main secondary bolt.
XP123
TY 4 Stroke Master
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,494
- Age
- 69
- Location
- Chautauqua NY
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- Sidewinder XTX LE 137
OK then if you are measuring from the stationary sheave on both clutches the belt deflection will NOT be effected. That is where my confusion was coming from. The offset should not change at all if you are measuring from fixed sheaves no matter what you do with the belt adjuster.I see what your getting at and how changing offset affects belt deflection. But your still measuring to the stationary sheaves is what I’m saying.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 2K
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.