I want to add that I understand why Yamaha sled fans are upset. What they did years back was inexplicable, but I do hold faith that they know what went wrong and will correct it
If Yamaha & artic cat come out with all new chassis in 2020 , what would sell more 2 stroke sleds ??? A sled with a Yamaha 2 stroke or a artic cat 2 stroke ?? Artic cat doesn't have the technology to reconfigure motors & up size to 850 cc motors quickly. Yamaha has the power to come up with motors they need .... I think a 600 & 850 are coming...
Sasquatch, consumers don’t buy engines or chassis, they buy complete snowmobiles. Snowmobile manufacture have to develop both engines and chassis to keep up with consumer trends and new technologies if they want to stay in the business. Yamaha’s position after sales started to drop were that they were not going invest in sled development unless they could get a return on their investment. Well if your “latest sled offerings” are 10 year old technology do you think you are going to sell enough of the old tech to warrant investment in the new tech? That answer is obvious. So Yamaha ended up in this death spiral until forced into the relationship with AC.
Yamaha’s decision to go complete 4-stroke based on tightening emissions standards was a completely irresponsible business decision. Regulations change all the time. Yamaha is known for making PREMIER engines and they couldn’t continue developing both 4-stroke and 2-strokes like the other manufactures? The manufactures that did continue development and built what customers were demanding thrived even though world wide sled sales decreased. Yamaha thought they were smarter than their customers and tried forcing their ideas of what a sled should be down everyone’s throat.
I’ve owned three Apex based machines and they were great for groomed trail riding which is what I do, but you could not give them away to people riding the mountains, off-trail boondocking, or ditchbangers. What Yamaha did would be like Ski-Doo trying to survive off of only selling 900ACE and 600ACE variants.
WRT your statement that you used no exclamation points...better go check again but there is at least one used and it’s in the first sentence!! LOL.
If I didnt have Faith I wouldnt be here. I agree. Its actually exciting!Nope don't have to and sorry for giving my opinion. If you pay attention to my posts, I just got back into sledding after a 30 year absence and have a 1997 Vmax. Didn't want to invest a boat load of money into a sled (new models) to figure out I did not like it. Fact is I still like it at 58 years young and also love Yamaha sleds. I have confidence in them to resolve this issue, to bad others don't
Till Cat sells Yamaha their 2 strokes for the new Yamaha Chassis. That would make them even more competitive. Who knows. Hopefully we get to see SOMETHING happen and soon.But it was a well placed one!
Sasquatch, consumers don’t buy engines or chassis, they buy complete snowmobiles. Snowmobile manufacture have to develop both engines and chassis to keep up with consumer trends and new technologies if they want to stay in the business. Yamaha’s position after sales started to drop were that they were not going invest in sled development unless they could get a return on their investment. Well if your “latest sled offerings” are 10 year old technology do you think you are going to sell enough of the old tech to warrant investment in the new tech? That answer is obvious. So Yamaha ended up in this death spiral until forced into the relationship with AC.
Yamaha’s decision to go complete 4-stroke based on tightening emissions standards was a completely irresponsible business decision. Regulations change all the time. Yamaha is known for making PREMIER engines and they couldn’t continue developing both 4-stroke and 2-strokes like the other manufactures? The manufactures that did continue development and built what customers were demanding thrived even though world wide sled sales decreased. Yamaha thought they were smarter than their customers and tried forcing their ideas of what a sled should be down everyone’s throat.
I’ve owned three Apex based machines and they were great for groomed trail riding which is what I do, but you could not give them away to people riding the mountains, off-trail boondocking, or ditchbangers. What Yamaha did would be like Ski-Doo trying to survive off of only selling 900ACE and 600ACE variants.
WRT your statement that you used no exclamation points...better go check again but there is at least one used and it’s in the first sentence!! LOL.
It seems that everyone has decided that Yamaha's decision to go with 4 stroke engines over 2 strokes was wrong, and that Yamaha's current position at the bottom of the pile is due to that mistake. Honestly, I think that the decision to go with 4-strokes was 100% correct. Where Yamaha fell down was that they did not develop a competitive chassis for their engines. If Yamaha had stayed with 2-strokes and built delta-box sleds like the Vector and Apex, they would already be out of the snowmobile business. What made me switch to Yamaha from Polaris was that sweet little 1049 cc 4-stroke engine in the Vector. If the Vector had been a 2-stroke, I would still be riding Polaris sleds.
So while I agree that Yamaha has made mistakes in its' snowmobile production, I believe its' biggest mistake was not staying ahead of the competition with chassis design. I don't have numbers to prove it, but my "seat of the pants" feeling is that Yamaha's alliance with AC ended up with a big boost in Yamaha sales. I know that in the few short years the Viper has been out, I have seen many more Vipers on the trails than I ever saw Vectors or Apexes. Once Yamaha had a decent chassis for its 4-stroke engine, they became "relevant" to the snowmobile world again.
So a Yamaha 2-stroke would be nice, and it would probably sell, but what will ultimately seal the fate of Yamaha snowmobiling will be the chassis that their engines sit in.
They CHOOSE not to build a chassis and suspension. There is no doubt they could if they wanted too.I'll also add that all it would have taken to turn Yamaha around would have been a good chassis, good suspension, the proof is the current Cat chassis/suspension. If Yamaha had built that and stuffed the Apex engine in it sales would have continued to increase. You can't blame it all on the two stroke! It was Yamaha's inability to build a chassis that hurt them! Two stroke or four is irrelevant they needed a better chassis either way! As we see and are seeing they can not build a chassis or suspension.
I would say so. My Viper and Sidewinder are the BEST Yamaha sleds I have ever ridden. As a matter of fact my Sidewinder is the BEST sled I have ever owned ( well over 30 sleds to date) and best set up right out of the box.Holy cow! Seems all of us in this huge thread agree if Yamaha does get back in the game they need to make a chassis/suspension at least as good as the Cat chassis.
You seem sure theres a new chassis.I hope youre right.Till Cat sells Yamaha their 2 strokes for the new Yamaha Chassis. That would make them even more competitive. Who knows. Hopefully we get to see SOMETHING happen and soon.
I'll also add that all it would have taken to turn Yamaha around would have been a good chassis, good suspension, the proof is the current Cat chassis/suspension. If Yamaha had built that and stuffed the Apex engine in it sales would have continued to increase. You can't blame it all on the two stroke! It was Yamaha's inability to build a chassis that hurt them! Two stroke or four is irrelevant they needed a better chassis either way! As we see and are seeing they can not build a chassis or suspension.
Even if they built the best chassis ever, with only heavier 4-stroke engines to put in that great chassis Yamaha would still only have great trail sleds while completely ignoring customers in other segments of the markets. Ditchbangers don't want that, neither do the mountain, boondockers and crossover segments. There really is no argument. All you have to do is look at sled sales. The strong majority want 2-strokes. Not me, not you, not most people on this site, but you can't ignore the facts.
They CHOOSE not to build a chassis and suspension. There is no doubt they could if they wanted too.