• We are no longer supporting TapaTalk as a mobile app for our sites. The TapaTalk App has many issues with speed on our server as well as security holes that leave us vulnerable to attacks and spammers.

Skinz concept 36" -5" forward

the only concern i would have with going too narrow is high speed stability. these sled are capable to going 100mph. Yes I do realize that when you are boondocking and riding in deep powder you are not going anywhere too quickly but there are those occassions that you find yourself wanting to open it up in a wide open area. I would hate to find out the limits of having a too narrow front end with the thing pinned. So often the case it seems when you improve things in one area you make things worse in other areas. just my opinion though
 

bholmlate said:
the only concern i would have with going too narrow is high speed stability. these sled are capable to going 100mph. Yes I do realize that when you are boondocking and riding in deep powder you are not going anywhere too quickly but there are those occassions that you find yourself wanting to open it up in a wide open area. I would hate to find out the limits of having a too narrow front end with the thing pinned. So often the case it seems when you improve things in one area you make things worse in other areas. just my opinion though
just gear your sled down real low so your top speed is much lower... lol
 
bholmlate said:
the only concern i would have with going too narrow is high speed stability. these sled are capable to going 100mph. Yes I do realize that when you are boondocking and riding in deep powder you are not going anywhere too quickly but there are those occassions that you find yourself wanting to open it up in a wide open area. I would hate to find out the limits of having a too narrow front end with the thing pinned. So often the case it seems when you improve things in one area you make things worse in other areas. just my opinion though

First mountain sled I ever had, had a ski stance of like 32"........real interesting!!!!!
 
Ok since you are obviously good at fabricating things why dont you build a nytro with a 32 in wide ski stance and let us all know how things work for you. I would be willing to bet i already know the answer.
 
bholmlate said:
Ok since you are obviously good at fabricating things why dont you build a nytro with a 32 in wide ski stance and let us all know how things work for you. I would be willing to bet i already know the answer.

Haha! 32" is and was a little on the narrow side! I will never forget a certain corner that I went around totally laid over. Immediately afterwards that sled got another 4" of ski stance.
 
Here's my latest. Upper and lower mounts aren't done yet......pardon the rags. 38" wide.
 

Attachments

  • 000_0001.JPG
    000_0001.JPG
    288.3 KB · Views: 149
  • 000_0002.JPG
    000_0002.JPG
    332.8 KB · Views: 137
Got them done yesterday. 38" wide (ski spacer adjustment gives you 36-40" adjustment), +3" forward. Independently adjustable camber and caster. Proper shock placement (no funky shock angles or shock mods required).
 

Attachments

  • 000_0001.JPG
    000_0001.JPG
    321.3 KB · Views: 178
  • 000_0002.JPG
    000_0002.JPG
    331.2 KB · Views: 143
  • 000_0004.JPG
    000_0004.JPG
    350.3 KB · Views: 141
AKrider said:
That's a very unique front end!

A few pics of the final production version.
 

Attachments

  • 000_0017.JPG
    000_0017.JPG
    324.1 KB · Views: 142
  • 000_0016.JPG
    000_0016.JPG
    307.1 KB · Views: 156
  • 000_0014.JPG
    000_0014.JPG
    321.9 KB · Views: 134


Back
Top