Because the longer straps allows the skid to drop deeper into a negative bump resulting in a longer travel when impacting the positive bump that follows.
The shorter strap does compress the skid and shocks slightly giving away on the soft part of the shock. I have studied this while working on the skid, and these are my observations.
I agree on what you say on the monoshock, it's also valid on the proaction. In those skids the more transfer the softer the ride. When impacting a bump with max transfer the front arm is allow to travel further upwards before the skid couples thus it soakes up more of the bump without sending the impack up to the rider. Imagine, no transfer and fully coupled skid, when the front arm hits the bump the whole skid is forced upwards immediately, transferring the energy upwards to the rider.
The more the transfer the less the coupling on the monoshock and proaction.
On the ZX-2 the transfer and coupling are somewhat separated. Going with coupler in #1 hole I kept the transfer from the #4 hole and at the same time the front of the sled went down. When forcing the revolver to insert the bolt into the #1 we noticed that the skid is moving rearward and up a little, this rearward movement shifts the weight balance forward slightly resulting in increased ski pressure, this happens without taking much if any away on the #4 transfer. My sled transferred better with this setup, than with coupling in #2 hole and limiter sucked up one notch.
To set the coupler in the #1 hole I had to remove the #4 bolt to be able to insert the bolt into #1 hole. It would have been though adjusting them by myself, having my buddy helping was great
