boostfever
Veteran
What do you estimate the power to be, has martin calculated mass air flow?
Brent68
Lifetime Member
He hasn't done one that I know of. All the data is available but system is currently configured to use the intake manifold pressure sensor as part of the calculation and it's only a 2 bar sensor. The engine is running beyond the IMAP sensor limits. Probably should put it on the Dyno, maybe this spring? All I can use to validate power at this point is the clutching, 90.5 grams (DTYA-3) black/green primary and secondary uses a 41/37 helix and dalton orange, runs 9000+ rpm.What do you estimate the power to be, has martin calculated mass air flow?
boostfever
Veteran
Pretty impressive to run with a motec 1200, gotta be making some serious power!!
The tuned winders must have been bus lengths behind, who’s tunes were they running?
The tuned winders must have been bus lengths behind, who’s tunes were they running?
Brent68
Lifetime Member
No, it’s not bus lengths different. I would say six to eight lengths in 660. The flashed tunes were the biggest available. Keep in mind this was all pump gas. They’re plenty of flashed sleds using higher octane fuel and stock turbo that would change the results of this test.Pretty impressive to run with a motec 1200, gotta be making some serious power!!
The tuned winders must have been bus lengths behind, who’s tunes were they running?
ktmhk53
Suspended
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2006
- Messages
- 64
With such good results, what areas/mods will you now focus on?
Brent68
Lifetime Member
How did you know I was thinking of doing a few more things? Here’s a list of the some changes planned:With such good results, what areas/mods will you now focus on?
1. Track with pitch change.
2. Lightened drive shaft/drivers.
3. STM primary.
4. Pistons, rods, head studs.
5. Install the bigger intercooler.
6. Add a header.
7. SRX springs.
8. Stealth anti-lag.
I will only get to about half of these done this winter as my season ends in mid February due to a pending surgery.
ktmhk53
Suspended
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2006
- Messages
- 64
Exciting changes ahead!
Who will you use for a supplier of the internal engine parts?
Who will you use for a supplier of the internal engine parts?
Brent68
Lifetime Member
Internal parts will come from Ulmer, but likely happen after this season.Exciting changes ahead!
Who will you use for a supplier of the internal engine parts?
ktmhk53
Suspended
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2006
- Messages
- 64
Have you had a chance to do any more testing or upgrades?
Brent68
Lifetime Member
I’m mostly just refining the tune. I changed the over-boost strategy to ramp the boost to 21 psi quicker and leaned the AFR from 11.8 to 12.0. Comparing log files after the adjustments it added a solid 100 RPM over a 660' pull. Also ran for 200 miles on the trails last weekend, which were surprisingly good in the Hayward area if you picked the right trails. Its trail manners were just as good as my flashed sidewinder. Although it is a little noisy on the trail with the exhaust set up.Have you had a chance to do any more testing or upgrades?
I have done some comparisons in spool time (0-100kpa) between this sled and the motec doo. On average the Xona Rotor sidewinder spool time is .55 seconds compared to .36 seconds on the doo. BTW, the best the stock turbo spools that I have recorded are about .1 second quicker than the Xona Rotor, but it's difficult to get real good resolution with the gapflasher logging software. My goal is to get spool time less than .4 seconds, which would be better than a stock turbo sidewider. I would realy like to install a header to see if it improves the spool time. The idea is to get the exhaust pulses from each cyclinder as close to the turbo as possible to improve spool time.
I did snap a belt during intial testing a few weeks ago (600 total miles on the belt).....I was doing many back to back runs and deserved to snap the belt, no belt issues since (300 miles). One mod I did that's works well is a negative sag kit from Hygear. I wanted to control/lower the stance similar to the SRX but the SRX springs are on national back order. The kit from Hygear is less than $100 and gives you a ton of control on the front ride height. Next up, I have the big intercooler on my bench but a slight mod needs to be done for it to fit, might get to it this weekend?
Last edited:
ClutchMaster
HUGE Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
- Messages
- 2,996
- Location
- tomahawk
- Country
- USA
- Snowmobile
- 2015 Viper 270 hurricane,
2002 Viper W/162 A.C. skid, SRX pipes &CDI, 780 BB
- LOCATION
- Wisconsin
Awsome! Thanks for the update!
Always has been a debate on lean or rich spool in the Evo/DSM world. Personally I have never had any luck with a rich 10:1 afr spool. Evo’s have a “lean spool” routine in the ecu. I used to spool as lean as 13:1 with good results with some timing pulled. Best safe spooling I felt was at around 12.7 on gasoline with timing slightly reduced. Close eye on you knock voltage tho.
It just makes sense the big Doo motor will spool faster.
Clutching helps a lot, I’m gonna try a straight cut helix in my sled. You kinda need to clutch it like an old 2 stroke I figure, with a narrow powerband, then get those rpm’s up with a hard upshift. Problem is I don’t want to affect trailability (I think that’s a real word?)
Cheers, CM
Always has been a debate on lean or rich spool in the Evo/DSM world. Personally I have never had any luck with a rich 10:1 afr spool. Evo’s have a “lean spool” routine in the ecu. I used to spool as lean as 13:1 with good results with some timing pulled. Best safe spooling I felt was at around 12.7 on gasoline with timing slightly reduced. Close eye on you knock voltage tho.
It just makes sense the big Doo motor will spool faster.
Clutching helps a lot, I’m gonna try a straight cut helix in my sled. You kinda need to clutch it like an old 2 stroke I figure, with a narrow powerband, then get those rpm’s up with a hard upshift. Problem is I don’t want to affect trailability (I think that’s a real word?)
Cheers, CM
Brent68
Lifetime Member
I struggle with the clutching but really enjoy the challenge. It’s great being able to make adjustments and able see exactly how the engine/performance responds. If you find any “secrect sauce” for clutching these things, I would love to hear.Awsome! Thanks for the update!
Always has been a debate on lean or rich spool in the Evo/DSM world. Personally I have never had any luck with a rich 10:1 afr spool. Evo’s have a “lean spool” routine in the ecu. I used to spool as lean as 13:1 with good results with some timing pulled. Best safe spooling I felt was at around 12.7 on gasoline with timing slightly reduced. Close eye on you knock voltage tho.
It just makes sense the big Doo motor will spool faster.
Clutching helps a lot, I’m gonna try a straight cut helix in my sled. You kinda need to clutch it like an old 2 stroke I figure, with a narrow powerband, then get those rpm’s up with a hard upshift. Problem is I don’t want to affect trailability (I think that’s a real word?)
Cheers, CM
SanDale Fabrication
Expert
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2015
- Messages
- 244
- Age
- 51
- Country
- Canada
- Snowmobile
- 2017 998 turbo
Such a great build!! Thank you for sharing this will all of us!
Mike
Mike
Brent68
Lifetime Member
Thank you for the great products! It’s fabricators/innovators, like you, that make this such an awesome sport.Such a great build!! Thank you for sharing this will all of us!
Mike
Similar threads
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 48K
- Replies
- 32
- Views
- 4K
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.