
Dr. FeeLGooD
VIP Member
Do the the updated shafts in the 2021 sleds have an updated part number?
Yea like Tflash said it’s garbage grease, I use full synthetic mobile SHC PM460 grease with a super high tolerance for moisture intrusion. NLGI 1.5 it’s white and has a very good viscosity index which means temperature changes have little effect on its consistency.Also do yourself a favor. Get rid of the piece of #*$&@ Yamaha bearing made in China. I had brand new Yamaha bearing, and an SKF bearing. The difference it took to spin the china bearing vs the SKF was unbelievable. Now it's real cold out, that China bearing ain't budging til it warms up.
Sorry, not true. I cleaned out both bearings of all grease. The china bearing spun easily with no grease. But when I added the same grease to both, the China bearing just about locked up again. They're garbage, and gonna replace all the bearing with SKF when I can. Added Lucas oil Red and Tacky to both.That has much more to do with the grease in the bearing rather than the metal components (52100 chrome steel balls, 52100 chrome steel inner race, 52100 chrome steel outer race, and stainless steel retainer). Likely if you washed all the grease out of both, they would turn with the same force. Type and quantity of grease are a big factor. I suspect the Chinese "cheat" when it comes to the material they make the components out of. And, I would bet they aren't able to hold the same tolerances consistently as high-quality manufacturers can. Net result is shorter bearing life along with bad fits to the parts they interface with. No doubt, high quality bearings will perform better and last longer.
Sorry, not true. I cleaned out both bearings of all grease. The china bearing spun easily with no grease. But when I added the same grease to both, the China bearing just about locked up again. They're garbage, and gonna replace all the bearing with SKF when I can. Added Lucas oil Red and Tacky to both.
New Drive Shafts are built a little heavier.
Barn of Parts Drive Shaft Saver did not fit without using a brake hone on the I.D. of shaft.
I added a washer & longer grade 8 bolt for total thread engagement.
Bearing got tight before 20ftlbs. Nice! Installed shaft and locked down to 30ftlbs. I don't see how it could spin again.
Old shaft had 7400 miles.
Original bearing was smooth, viscous, and seals tight. However 7400 miles is time to replace anyway for piece of mind.
One more shaft to go and we're ready for the season.
Is it safe to say that even if the bearing required light pressing or “motivation”to install on the shaft that there is no way the driveshaft saver would be strong enough to expand the shaft enough to damage the bearing or cause premature failure?? I would think think it would be near impossible.Do yourself a favor and torque it to 45 ft/lbs minimum.
Is it safe to say that even if the bearing required light pressing or “motivation”to install on the shaft that there is no way the driveshaft saver would be strong enough to expand the shaft enough to damage the bearing or cause premature failure?? I would think think it would be near impossible.
I had the shaft from my winder chrome plated and had it turned down to 1.7715. For install the shaft went in the freezer for 24 hours and inner race of the new SKF bearing was heated to 200 + * and still had trouble getting it together fast enough but got it done. I know it wont spin but still installed the drive shaft saver and torqued it to 45 lbs. Taking no, none, notta, zero chances any more with these shafts.Is it safe to say that even if the bearing required light pressing or “motivation”to install on the shaft that there is no way the driveshaft saver would be strong enough to expand the shaft enough to damage the bearing or cause premature failure?? I would think think it would be near impossible.
I did pretty much the same and still used the driveshaft saver as well. I just figured that everyone seems to be concerned with finding the right torque spec for their individual situation. If theres no risk of damage then everyone should just crank it down to the high end of the torque range and eliminate the guess work and wondering if its working or not. Of course this method may not work if your shaft already has wear but on new installed shafts or new sleds I say crank it down.I had the shaft from my winder chrome plated and had it turned down to 1.7715. For install the shaft went in the freezer for 24 hours and inner race of the new SKF bearing was heated to 200 + * and still had trouble getting it together fast enough but got it done. I know it wont spin but still installed the drive shaft saver and torqued it to 45 lbs. Taking no, none, notta, zero chances any more with these shafts.
I dont think we have a choice. Some of us including me were concerned that totally locking the bearing to driveshaft would cause a different type of failure due to chassis flex. Possibly the shaft or bearing failing instead of inner race slipping. The goal was to just make it tight enough to not spin but to be able to move in a extreme event. Probably impossible to achieve. Some have seen even green Loctite fail to hold the bearing from spinning but nobody I know of with one locked tight has had any failures elsewhere. I too am locking mine tight this year. Done messing with this.I did pretty much the same and still used the driveshaft saver as well. I just figured that everyone seems to be concerned with finding the right torque spec for their individual situation. If theres no risk of damage then everyone should just crank it down to the high end of the torque range and eliminate the guess work and wondering if its working or not. Of course this method may not work if your shaft already has wear but on new installed shafts or new sleds I say crank it down.